Search This Blog

Complex Rehab Vistors

Showing posts with label Houston. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Houston. Show all posts

Sunday, October 3, 2010

Therapeutic Adapted Biking


Shareby Mary Miles, PT September 27th, 2010
This article was originally posted on the EasyStand Blog, an online community for people with disabilities, their families, clinicians, and rehab suppliers. The EasyStand Blog brings people of all abilities together to work towards a common goal - living a higher quality of life through standing. Sponsored by Altimate Medical Inc.


School has started and with that we have some cooler weather. Fall is a great time to think about getting outdoors for a fun family outing. When you plan a fall outing, consider getting some exercise while you go out to enjoy the fall leaves. A bike ride with the kids can be a wonderful way to experience the fall weather. In the northern states we are experiencing some cool days, perfect for a ride along one of the many trails we have.

There are so many options available for biking with kids and special needs. The most common bike is an adapted three wheel bike that can provide a range of options from minimal support or more control with trunk and leg support options depending on the child’s needs. There are side by side bikes that allow parents to sit next to their child and bike along with them; in this case the child does need to be closer to the size of an adult body to reach the pedals and participate in the pedaling action. There is also an option for an adapted wheelchair that fits onto the front of the adult size bike to allow parents to ride while also bringing their child along for the experience. The best way to start your journey is to connect with your local medical supply vendor to check out what options might work for your child and see if you can trial a bike for your child. Also check with your school district or therapist to see what type of bike they may be using with your child at school or might be able to recommend.

Once you have decided upon your mode of biking, take some time to plan your biking event. Maybe you want to make your bike ride a destination ride. Consider that biking is a great way to improve your child’s strength and endurance, and when incorporated into a special outing, kids don’t really think of it as exercise. Plan a ride to a nearby park, pack a snack or lunch for your child to look forward to. Increase the distance as you take more outings; bike to the library, ice cream store or other motivating destinations while continuing to build upon your child’s fitness skills. The wonderful thing about biking is that it can be a lifetime skill enjoyed by the entire family. Remember not to over-do your first bike rides or your child may fatigue and associate biking in a negative manner. I know at our house we enjoy loading up our bikes to try different trails in the area. I hope this inspires you to check out the trails in your area and get outside to enjoy some of those crisp fall days!


Thanks to Easy Stand for this great article!

Monday, May 31, 2010

Texas leaders announce $1.2 billion in state cuts

By PEGGY FIKAC
AUSTIN BUREAU
May 18, 2010, 6:56PM  

AUSTIN — State leaders facing a budget shortfall announced $1.2 billion in cuts Tuesday, trimming such expenditures as Medicaid reimbursement rates for doctors but sparing areas including state psychiatric hospitals and most of the prison budget.

Gov. Rick Perry, Lt. Gov. David Dewhurst and House Speaker Joe Straus had asked state agencies to identify savings because of a looming budget gap through the next two-year fiscal period. Some put the shortfall as high as $18 billion.

The agencies had offered an estimated $1.7 billion in the current budget, based on targets set by the leaders. With Tuesday's exemptions, savings amount to $1.2 billion.

“Every penny we save now in the 2010-11 biennium is one penny closer to balancing the budget in the next legislative session,” Perry said in a statement.

Among cuts OK'd by the leaders is a drop in reimbursement rates for doctors and other health care providers who treat Medicaid patients, a move that doctors and advocates for lower-income Texans say would discourage providers from taking new Medicaid patients.

Some also have expressed concern because a cut in spending on human services programs means the loss of federal matching funds. The $205 million in overall cuts at health and human services agencies, including the reduced reimbursement rate, is estimated to cost another $190 million in federal matching funds.

Prison cuts pared
The Texas Department of Criminal Justice will see a $55 million reduction, but that's much less than the $294.3 million it had reluctantly offered in order to meet its target.

Prison officials had asked for exemptions from cutting items such as correctional officer positions and treatment programs, saying slashing those areas could hurt prison security and make it more likely offenders would commit crimes when released.

The leaders granted the exemptions. Cuts approved include unspent balances; money that was allocated for a facility whose opening is delayed for other reasons; and an initiative to hold down travel and overtime.

Among other savings, Perry identified $21.5 million in general-revenue spending cuts in his office, including $20 million from the deal-closing Texas Enterprise Fund that he has touted as a valuable tool to lure business. Perry, who said he wanted to lead by example, continues to champion the fund as a valuable tool. Democratic challenger Bill White is calling for an audit of the fund.

Mental hospitals spared
Items spared from cuts, besides prison programs, included hospital beds at the San Antonio, North Texas, Rusk and Terrell state hospitals. Human services officials had estimated the option would mean an estimated 1,447 fewer patients receiving services through fiscal 2011.

Leaders also protected Texas Department of Public Safety funds aimed at homeland and border security; Texas Workforce Commission job training and job creation programs; and Higher Education Coordinating Board increases in student financial aid.

The Texas Education Agency had offered cuts including eliminating of $1 million in state funding to the University Interscholastic League for steroid testing . Testing has found few students using steroids, but Dewhurst has championed the program, and leaders kept intact $750,000 of the money.

“We cannot afford business as usual, but must make tough choices and put every cost savings idea on the table,” Straus said in a statement. He has told House budget-writers to close the budget gap without new taxes.

pfikac@express-news.net

Evercare Already Has Problems in Hawaii

Posted on: Monday, May 24, 2010
On Complex Rehab Blog Houston Texas

Hawaii's Medicaid switch produces mixed results
By Mary Vorsino
Advertiser Staff Writer


Fifteen months after the state switched its Medicaid insurance program for more than 42,000 low-income seniors and disabled residents from a fee-for-service model to a managed care one, advocates say two firms hired to administer the program have improved services and beefed up provider networks.


But some point to cases involving patients who have seen cuts in care or who have struggled to navigate the Mainland-based plans because of language barriers or other reasons as continued areas of concern.

New statistics on the Quest Expanded Access program illustrate that mixed bag. The numbers show both insurance companies — 'Ohana Health Plan and Evercare — have decreased the average processing time for claims, from a high of 22 days to about 10, and increased the number of participating specialists.

Complaints from providers have also dropped, while complaints from Evercare members have increased. Evercare got just one complaint from a provider in April, and 'Ohana got two, down from 122 complaints against Evercare and 19 complaints against 'Ohana in the second quarter of 2009.

Meanwhile, 54 Evercare members made complaints last month and eight 'Ohana members did, according to figures provided to the Department of Human Services. In the second quarter of last year, shortly after the plans started, five Evercare members and 51 'Ohana members filed complaints.

Call volume at both plans remains high, but state officials point out that not all those calls are about problems. Some are questions about coverage. In the first quarter of last year, the plans got nearly 23,000 calls from members or providers. That compares with about 15,000 calls to the two plans in April alone.

The plans launched coverage in the Islands in February 2009, as part of a state push to improve Medicaid care, curb costs and streamline the health care system for the state's most vulnerable residents. 'Ohana and Evercare manage all aspects of care for Medicaid clients, from linking them to a doctor and coordinating their care to covering medical claims and providing transportation to appointments.

The plans have a three-year contract with the state. Of the $500 million annually that goes to Quest Expanded Access, $165 million comes from state coffers and the rest comes from the federal government.

"We believe things are going much better than at the beginning," said Patti Bazin, state health care services branch administrator, who helps oversee the Quest Expanded Access program. Last week, Bazin acknowledged that the switch to managed care was fraught with confusion, worries about coverage and concerns among clients and doctors over whether the plans had enough participating specialists.

The changes have also been challenged in court, but have so far been upheld.

"I really do have to say it's significantly improved," Bazin said. "It is meeting the needs of our clients."

cuts in services
Not everyone agrees. Some advocates, doctors and patients still aren't convinced the change to managed care was an improvement, and some are certain that it wasn't.

"It would be fine the way it is, if they really did what they promised," said Dr. Ritabelle Fernandes, who sees low-income patients at Kokua Kalihi Valley and Kalihi-Palama Health Center. "They're not doing what they're supposed to do."

Fernandes said her case managers spend hours on the phone with call centers at the plans to try to figure out what's covered and what's not and where patients can go for specialty care. She also said that many of her clients don't speak English and have trouble understanding their medical rights. A number of her patients, she said, are seeing cuts in care — to things like nursing or health aide services at home — but haven't filed complaints because they're afraid of losing their insurance altogether if they do.

Since the plans took over, patients have filed 209 appeals to cuts in services, claim denials or other changes, according to the state. Providers have filed 298 appeals. Details on the appeals weren't released.

For their part, the plans say they have addressed many concerns — bolstering their list of providers and specialists and working more swiftly to process claims. The plans also say that some of the problems cited by advocates aren't their fault, but a function of the inherently complex health care system, where about 65 percent of Hawai'i residents on Medicaid also have Medicare coverage for those over 65.

Figuring out whether Medicare or Medicaid covers treatment costs can be tough, even for providers.

That confusion is to blame for a significant portion of claim denials, the state says, adding that all medically necessary treatments must be approved. The 'Ohana plan denies about 21 percent of claims on average, while Evercare denies about 3 percent, according to state figures. DHS officials point out that the denial rate for the two plans is far lower than the 26 percent under the old fee-for-service model.

Erhardt Preitauer, regional president of 'Ohana, which covers more than 22,000 Quest Expanded Access clients in the Islands, said the dual insurance coverage (with clients in Medicare and Medicaid) "has caused confusion." He added, "we have spent a lot of time educating members on this."

He also said, in a statement, "We approve all medically necessary care to members."

An Evercare spokesman said the plan is "required to ... assure that members receive medically necessary services." He also said that in evaluating whether home or community-based services, such as skilled nursing home care, are needed, "we use clinical evaluation and assessment tools, input from the member, the member's providers, caregivers and family (and) our clinical field service coordinator."

One key criticism of the two insurers early on was that members, especially those on the Neighbor Islands or rural O'ahu, couldn't get access to specialists. Advocates say those problems still exist, though the plans' provider network has grown. Part of the issue is the shortage of specialists statewide, but many specialists have also opted not to participate in the program or have decided not to take new clients.

Dr. Ricardo Custodio, medical director at Wai'anae Coast Comprehensive Health Center, said the provider network in the plans "has gotten a little better. But it's not where we feel that it's to the benefit of the patients." He said wait times to see some specialists still appear longer than they should be.

Evercare launched with about 1,110 specialists, and now has 1,811.

'Ohana had 990 specialists in February 2009, and now has 1,348.

Leolinda Parlin, director of Hilopa'a Family to Family Health Information Center, which is an ombudsman for Quest Expanded Access clients, said there has been "tremendous progress" in the plans since their launch. She said her office has also been getting far fewer complaint calls from members.

"People have a better understanding of what QExA is about," she said.

In February 2009, the center got about 664 calls. In February of this year, it got 71.

Reach Mary Vorsino at mvorsino@honoluluadvertiser.com.

Friday, April 30, 2010

Power Mobility Device Medicare LCD

Indications and Limitations of Coverage and/or Medical Necessity
For any item to be covered by Medicare, it must 1) be eligible for a defined Medicare benefit category, 2) be reasonable and necessary for the diagnosis or treatment of illness or injury or to improve the functioning of a malformed body member, and 3) meet all other applicable Medicare statutory and regulatory requirements. For the items addressed in this medical policy, the criteria for "reasonable and necessary" are defined by the following indications and limitations of coverage and/or medical necessity.

Refer to the related Policy Article for statutory coverage information on orders and a face-to-face examination.

The term power mobility device (PMD) includes power operated vehicles (POVs) and power wheelchairs (PWCs).

BASIC COVERAGE CRITERIA:

All of the following basic criteria (A-C) must be met for a power mobility device (K0800-K0898) or a push-rim activated power assist device (E0986) to be covered. Additional coverage criteria for specific devices are listed below.
A. The patient has a mobility limitation that significantly impairs his/her ability to participate in one or more mobility-related activities of daily living (MRADLs) such as toileting, feeding, dressing, grooming, and bathing in customary locations in the home. A mobility limitation is one that:
• Prevents the patient from accomplishing an MRADL entirely, or
• Places the patient at reasonably determined heightened risk of morbidity or mortality secondary to the attempts to perform an MRADL; or
• Prevents the patient from completing an MRADL within a reasonable time frame.
B. The patient’s mobility limitation cannot be sufficiently and safely resolved by the use of an appropriately fitted cane or walker.
C. The patient does not have sufficient upper extremity function to self-propel an optimally-configured manual wheelchair in the home to perform MRADLs during a typical day.
• Limitations of strength, endurance, range of motion, or coordination, presence of pain, or deformity or absence of one or both upper extremities are relevant to the assessment of upper extremity function.
• An optimally-configured manual wheelchair is one with an appropriate wheelbase, device weight, seating options, and other appropriate nonpowered accessories.
POWER OPERATED VEHICLES (K0800-K0808, K0812):

A POV is covered if all of the basic coverage criteria (A-C) have been met and if criteria D-I are also met.
D. The patient is able to:
• Safely transfer to and from a POV, and
• Operate the tiller steering system, and
• Maintain postural stability and position while operating the POV in the home.

E. The patient’s mental capabilities (e.g., cognition, judgment) and physical capabilities (e.g., vision) are sufficient for safe mobility using a POV in the home.
F. The patient’s home provides adequate access between rooms, maneuvering space, and surfaces for the operation of the POV that is provided.
G. The patient’s weight is less than or equal to the weight capacity of the POV that is provided.
H. Use of a POV will significantly improve the patient’s ability to participate in MRADLs and the patient will use it in the home.
I. The patient has not expressed an unwillingness to use a POV in the home.

If a POV will be used inside the home and coverage criteria A-I are not met, it will be denied as not medically necessary.

Group 2 POVs (K0806-K0808) have added capabilities that are not needed for use in the home. Therefore, if a Group 2 POV is provided and coverage criteria for a POV are met, payment will be based on the allowance for the least costly medically appropriate alternative, the comparable Group 1 POV. (See Least Costly Alternative section for information relating to this and all subsequent LCA statements.)

If coverage criteria A-I are met and if a patient’s weight can be accommodated by a POV with a lower weight capacity than the POV that is provided, payment will be based on the allowance for the least costly medically appropriate alternative.

If a POV will only be used outside the home, see related Policy Article for information concerning noncoverage.


POWER WHEELCHAIRS (K0813-K0891, K0898):

A power wheelchair is covered if:
a. All of the basic coverage criteria (A-C) are met; and
b. The patient does not meet coverage criterion D, E, or F for a POV; and
c. Either criterion J or K is met; and
d. Criteria L, M, N, and O are met; and
e. Any coverage criteria pertaining to the specific wheelchair type (see below) are met.

J. The patient has the mental and physical capabilities to safely operate the power wheelchair that is provided; or
K. If the patient is unable to safely operate the power wheelchair, the patient has a caregiver who is unable to adequately propel an optimally configured manual wheelchair, but is available, willing, and able to safely operate the power wheelchair that is provided; and
L. The patient’s weight is less than or equal to the weight capacity of the power wheelchair that is provided.
M. The patient’s home provides adequate access between rooms, maneuvering space, and surfaces for the operation of the power wheelchair that is provided.
N. Use of a power wheelchair will significantly improve the patient’s ability to participate in MRADLs and the patient will use it in the home. For patients with severe cognitive and/or physical impairments, participation in MRADLs may require the assistance of a caregiver.
O. The patient has not expressed an unwillingness to use a power wheelchair in the home.
If the PWC will be used inside the home and coverage criteria (a)-(e) are not met but the criteria for a POV are met, payment will be based on the allowance for the least costly medically appropriate alternative.

If the PWC will be used inside the home and coverage criteria (a)-(e) are not met and the criteria for a POV are not met, it will be denied as not medically necessary.

If a PWC will only be used outside the home, see related Policy Article for information concerning noncoverage.

SPECIFIC TYPES OF POWER WHEELCHAIRS:
I. A Group 1 PWC (K0813-K0816) or a Group 2 PWC (K0820-K0829) is covered if all of the coverage criteria (a)-(e) for a PWC are met and the wheelchair is appropriate for the patient’s weight.
II. A Group 2 Single Power Option PWC (K0835 – K0840) is covered if all of the coverage criteria (a)-(e) for a PWC are met and if:
A. Criterion 1 or 2 is met; and
B. Criteria 3 and 4 are met.

3. The patient requires a drive control interface other than a hand or chin-operated standard proportional joystick (examples include but are not limited to head control, sip and puff, switch control).
4. The patient meets coverage criteria for a power tilt or a power recline seating system (see Wheelchair Options and Accessories policy for coverage criteria) and the system is being used on the wheelchair.
5. The patient has had a specialty evaluation that was performed by a licensed/certified medical professional, such as a physical therapist (PT) or occupational therapist (OT), or physician who has specific training and experience in rehabilitation wheelchair evaluations and that documents the medical necessity for the wheelchair and its special features (see Documentation Requirements section). The PT, OT, or physician may have no financial relationship with the supplier.
6. The wheelchair is provided by a supplier that employs a RESNA-certified Assistive Technology Professional (ATP) who specializes in wheelchairs and who has direct, in-person involvement in the wheelchair selection for the patient.
If a Group 2 Single Power Option PWC is provided and if II(A) or II(B) is not met (including but not limited to situations in which it is only provided to accommodate a power seat elevation feature, a power standing feature, or only power elevating legrests) but the coverage criteria for a PWC are met, payment will be based on the allowance for the least costly medically appropriate alternative Group 2 PWC.
III. A Group 2 Multiple Power Option PWC (K0841-K0843) is covered if all of the coverage criteria (a)-(e) for a PWC are met and if:
. Criterion 1 or 2 is met; and
A. Criteria 3 and 4 are met.

2. The patient meets coverage criteria for a power tilt and recline seating system (see Wheelchair Options and Accessories policy) and the system is being used on the wheelchair.
3. The patient uses a ventilator which is mounted on the wheelchair.
4. The patient has had a specialty evaluation that was performed by a licensed/certified medical professional, such as a PT or OT, or physician who has specific training and experience in rehabilitation wheelchair evaluations and that documents the medical necessity for the wheelchair and its special features (see Documentation Requirements section). The PT, OT, or physician may have no financial relationship with the supplier.
5. The wheelchair is provided by a supplier that employs a RESNA-certified Assistive Technology Professional (ATP) who specializes in wheelchairs and who has direct, in-person involvement in the wheelchair selection for the patient.
If a Group 2 Multiple Power Option PWC is provided and if III(A) or III(B) is not met but the criteria for another PWC are met, payment will be based on the allowance for the least costly medically appropriate alternative Group 2 PWC.
IV. A Group 3 PWC with no power options (K0848-K0855) is covered if:
. All of the coverage criteria (a)-(e) for a PWC are met; and
A. The patient’s mobility limitation is due to a neurological condition, myopathy, or congenital skeletal deformity; and
B. The patient has had a specialty evaluation that was performed by a licensed/certified medical professional, such as a PT or OT, or physician who has specific training and experience in rehabilitation wheelchair evaluations and that documents the medical necessity for the wheelchair and its special features (see Documentation Requirements section). The PT, OT, or physician may have no financial relationship with the supplier; and
C. The wheelchair is provided by a supplier that employs a RESNA-certified Assistive Technology Professional (ATP) who specializes in wheelchairs and who has direct, in-person involvement in the wheelchair selection for the patient.

If a Group 3 PWC is provided and criterion A is met but either criterion B, C or D is not met, payment will be based on the allowance for the least costly medically appropriate alternative Group 2 PWC.
V. A Group 3 PWC with Single Power Option (K0856-K0860) or with Multiple Power Options (K0861-K0864) is covered if:
. The Group 3 criteria IV(A) and IV(B) are met; and
A. The Group 2 Single Power Option (criteria II[A] and II[B]) or Multiple Power Options (criteria III[A] and III[B]) (respectively) are met.

If a Group 3 Single Power Option or Multiple Power Options PWC is provided and Criterion IV(A) is met but all of the other coverage criteria are not met, payment will be based on the allowance for the least costly medically appropriate alternative Group 2 or Group 3 PWC.
VI. Group 4 PWCs (K0868-K0886) have added capabilities that are not needed for use in the home. Therefore, if these wheelchairs are provided and coverage criteria for a Group 2 or Group 3 PWC are met, payment will be based on the allowance for the least costly medically appropriate alternative.

If a Group 4 PWC is billed with a KX modifier (see Documentation Requirements section), payment at the time of initial automated processing will be based on the allowance for the comparable Group 3 PWC.
VII. A Group 5 (Pediatric) PWC with Single Power Option (K0890) or with Multiple Power Options (K0891) is covered if:
. All the coverage criteria (a)-(e) for a PWC are met; and
A. The patient is expected to grow in height; and
B. The Group 2 Single Power Option (criteria II[A] and II[B]) or Multiple Power Options (criteria III[A] and III[B]) (respectively) are met.

If a Group 5 PWC is provided but all the coverage criteria are not met, payment will be based on the allowance for the least costly medically appropriate alternative.
VIII. A push-rim activated power assist device (E0986) for a manual wheelchair is covered if all of the following criteria are met:
. All of the criteria for a power mobility device listed in the Basic Coverage Criteria section are met; and
A. The patient has been self-propelling in a manual wheelchair for at least one year; and
B. The patient has had a specialty evaluation that was performed by a licensed/certified medical professional, such as a PT or OT, or physician who has specific training and experience in rehabilitation wheelchair evaluations and that documents the need for the device in the patient’s home. The PT, OT, or physician may have no financial relationship with the supplier; and
C. The wheelchair is provided by a supplier that employs a RESNA-certified Assistive Technology Professional (ATP) who specializes in wheelchairs and who has direct, in-person involvement in the wheelchair selection for the patient.

If all of the coverage criteria are not met, it will be denied as not medically necessary.


LEAST COSTLY ALTERNATIVE:

Coverage criteria for power mobility devices are based on a stepwise progression of medical necessity. If coverage criteria for the device that is provided are not met and if there is another device that meets the patient’s medical needs (as defined in this policy), payment will be based on the allowance for the least costly medically appropriate alternative.

Determinations of least costly alternative will take into account the patient’s weight, seating needs, and needs for other special features (i.e., power seating systems, alternative drive controls, ventilators).

Based on the criteria defined above, some types of PMDs will never be paid in full but will always be either paid as a least costly alternative (if coverage criteria are met) or denied (if coverage criteria for a PMD are not met). In those situations, the first level least costly alternative determination will be made by an automated system edit. However in many situations, the final determination of a least costly alternative can only be made at the time of manual review of a claim during medical review or a fraud investigation. Therefore, even if a payment reduction is made at the time of an initial claim determination, this does not preclude subsequent further adjustment in payment or denial based on the application of all coverage criteria in this policy at the time of post-payment manual claim review.


MISCELLANEOUS:

A POV or power wheelchair with Captain's Chair is not appropriate for a patient who needs a separate wheelchair seat and/or back cushion. If a skin protection and/or positioning seat or back cushion that meets coverage criteria (see Wheelchair Seating LCD) is provided with a POV or a power wheelchair with Captain's Chair, the POV or PWC will be denied as not medically necessary. (Refer to Wheelchair Seating LCD and Policy Article for information concerning coverage of general use, skin protection, or positioning cushions when they are provided with a POV or power wheelchair with Captain's Chair.)

If a patient needs a seat and/or back cushion but does not meet coverage criteria for a skin protection and/or positioning cushion, it is appropriate to provide a Captain's Chair seat (if the code exists) rather than a sling/solid seat/back and a separate general use seat and/or back cushion. If a general use seat and/or back cushion is provided with a power wheelchair with a sling/solid seat/back, total payment for those items will be based on the allowance for the least costly medically appropriate alternative – e.g., the code for the comparable power wheelchair with Captain's Chair, if that code exists.

If a patient’s weight can be accommodated by a PWC with a lower weight capacity than the wheelchair that is provided, payment will be based on the allowance for the least costly medically appropriate alternative.

A seat elevator is a noncovered option on a power wheelchair. Therefore, if a Group 2 Seat Elevator PWC (K0830, K0831) is provided and if all of the criteria (a)-(e) for a PWC are met, payment will be based on the allowance for the least costly medically appropriate alternative Group 2 PWC without seat elevator.

The delivery of the PMD must be within 120 days following completion of the face-to face examination. (Exception: For PWCs that go through the Advance Determination of Medicare Coverage (ADMC) process and receive an affirmative determination, the delivery must be within 6 months following the determination.)

An add-on to convert a manual wheelchair to a joystick-controlled power mobility device (E0983) or to a tiller-controlled power mobility device (E0984) will be denied as not medically necessary.

Payment is made for only one wheelchair at a time. Backup chairs are denied as not medically necessary.

One month's rental of a PWC or POV (K0462) is covered if a patient-owned wheelchair is being repaired. Payment is based on the type of replacement device that is provided but will not exceed the rental allowance for the power mobility device that is being repaired.

A power mobility device will be denied as not medically necessary if the underlying condition is reversible and the length of need is less than 3 months (e.g., following lower extremity surgery which limits ambulation).

A POV or PWC which has not been reviewed by the Pricing, Data Analysis, and Coding (PDAC) contractor or which has been reviewed by the PDAC and found not to meet the definition of a specific POV/PWC (K0899) will be denied as not medically necessary.

Coding Information
Bill Type Codes: back to top
Contractors may specify Bill Types to help providers identify those Bill Types typically used to report this service. Absence of a Bill Type does not guarantee that the policy does not apply to that Bill Type. Complete absence of all Bill Types indicates that coverage is not influenced by Bill Type and the policy should be assumed to apply equally to all claims.
Revenue Codes: back to top
Contractors may specify Revenue Codes to help providers identify those Revenue Codes typically used to report this service. In most instances Revenue Codes are purely advisory; unless specified in the policy services reported under other Revenue Codes are equally subject to this coverage determination. Complete absence of all Revenue Codes indicates that coverage is not influenced by Revenue Code and the policy should be assumed to apply equally to all Revenue Codes.

CPT/HCPCS Codes back to top

The appearance of a code in this section does not necessarily indicate coverage.

HCPCS MODIFIERS:

EY – No physician or other licensed health care provider order for this item or service

GA - Waiver of liability statement on file

GY – Item or service statutorily excluded or doesn’t meet the definition of any Medicare benefit category

GZ - Item or service expected to be denied as not reasonable and necessary

KX – Requirements specified in the medical policy have been met

HCPCS CODES:
E0983 MANUAL WHEELCHAIR ACCESSORY, POWER ADD-ON TO CONVERT MANUAL WHEELCHAIR TO MOTORIZED WHEELCHAIR, JOYSTICK CONTROL
E0984 MANUAL WHEELCHAIR ACCESSORY, POWER ADD-ON TO CONVERT MANUAL WHEELCHAIR TO MOTORIZED WHEELCHAIR, TILLER CONTROL
E0986 MANUAL WHEELCHAIR ACCESSORY, PUSH ACTIVATED POWER ASSIST, EACH
K0800 POWER OPERATED VEHICLE, GROUP 1 STANDARD, PATIENT WEIGHT CAPACITY UP TO AND INCLUDING 300 POUNDS
K0801 POWER OPERATED VEHICLE, GROUP 1 HEAVY DUTY, PATIENT WEIGHT CAPACITY 301 TO 450 POUNDS
K0802 POWER OPERATED VEHICLE, GROUP 1 VERY HEAVY DUTY, PATIENT WEIGHT CAPACITY 451 TO 600 POUNDS
K0806 POWER OPERATED VEHICLE, GROUP 2 STANDARD, PATIENT WEIGHT CAPACITY UP TO AND INCLUDING 300 POUNDS
K0807 POWER OPERATED VEHICLE, GROUP 2 HEAVY DUTY, PATIENT WEIGHT CAPACITY 301 TO 450 POUNDS
K0808 POWER OPERATED VEHICLE, GROUP 2 VERY HEAVY DUTY, PATIENT WEIGHT CAPACITY 451 TO 600 POUNDS
K0812 POWER OPERATED VEHICLE, NOT OTHERWISE CLASSIFIED
K0813 POWER WHEELCHAIR, GROUP 1 STANDARD, PORTABLE, SLING/SOLID SEAT AND BACK, PATIENT WEIGHT CAPACITY UP TO AND INCLUDING 300 POUNDS
K0814 POWER WHEELCHAIR, GROUP 1 STANDARD, PORTABLE, CAPTAINS CHAIR, PATIENT WEIGHT CAPACITY UP TO AND INCLUDING 300 POUNDS
K0815 POWER WHEELCHAIR, GROUP 1 STANDARD, SLING/SOLID SEAT AND BACK, PATIENT WEIGHT CAPACITY UP TO AND INCLUDING 300 POUNDS
K0816 POWER WHEELCHAIR, GROUP 1 STANDARD, CAPTAINS CHAIR, PATIENT WEIGHT CAPACITY UP TO AND INCLUDING 300 POUNDS
K0820 POWER WHEELCHAIR, GROUP 2 STANDARD, PORTABLE, SLING/SOLID SEAT/BACK, PATIENT WEIGHT CAPACITY UP TO AND INCLUDING 300 POUNDS
K0821 POWER WHEELCHAIR, GROUP 2 STANDARD, PORTABLE, CAPTAINS CHAIR, PATIENT WEIGHT CAPACITY UP TO AND INCLUDING 300 POUNDS
K0822 POWER WHEELCHAIR, GROUP 2 STANDARD, SLING/SOLID SEAT/BACK, PATIENT WEIGHT CAPACITY UP TO AND INCLUDING 300 POUNDS
K0823 POWER WHEELCHAIR, GROUP 2 STANDARD, CAPTAINS CHAIR, PATIENT WEIGHT CAPACITY UP TO AND INCLUDING 300 POUNDS
K0824 POWER WHEELCHAIR, GROUP 2 HEAVY DUTY, SLING/SOLID SEAT/BACK, PATIENT WEIGHT CAPACITY 301 TO 450 POUNDS
K0825 POWER WHEELCHAIR, GROUP 2 HEAVY DUTY, CAPTAINS CHAIR, PATIENT WEIGHT CAPACITY 301 TO 450 POUNDS
K0826 POWER WHEELCHAIR, GROUP 2 VERY HEAVY DUTY, SLING/SOLID SEAT/BACK, PATIENT WEIGHT CAPACITY 451 TO 600 POUNDS
K0827 POWER WHEELCHAIR, GROUP 2 VERY HEAVY DUTY, CAPTAINS CHAIR, PATIENT WEIGHT CAPACITY 451 TO 600 POUNDS
K0828 POWER WHEELCHAIR, GROUP 2 EXTRA HEAVY DUTY, SLING/SOLID SEAT/BACK, PATIENT WEIGHT CAPACITY 601 POUNDS OR MORE
K0829 POWER WHEELCHAIR, GROUP 2 EXTRA HEAVY DUTY, CAPTAINS CHAIR, PATIENT WEIGHT 601 POUNDS OR MORE
K0830 POWER WHEELCHAIR, GROUP 2 STANDARD, SEAT ELEVATOR, SLING/SOLID SEAT/BACK, PATIENT WEIGHT CAPACITY UP TO AND INCLUDING 300 POUNDS
K0831 POWER WHEELCHAIR, GROUP 2 STANDARD, SEAT ELEVATOR, CAPTAINS CHAIR, PATIENT WEIGHT CAPACITY UP TO AND INCLUDING 300 POUNDS
K0835 POWER WHEELCHAIR, GROUP 2 STANDARD, SINGLE POWER OPTION, SLING/SOLID SEAT/BACK, PATIENT WEIGHT CAPACITY UP TO AND INCLUDING 300 POUNDS
K0836 POWER WHEELCHAIR, GROUP 2 STANDARD, SINGLE POWER OPTION, CAPTAINS CHAIR, PATIENT WEIGHT CAPACITY UP TO AND INCLUDING 300 POUNDS
K0837 POWER WHEELCHAIR, GROUP 2 HEAVY DUTY, SINGLE POWER OPTION, SLING/SOLID SEAT/BACK, PATIENT WEIGHT CAPACITY 301 TO 450 POUNDS
K0838 POWER WHEELCHAIR, GROUP 2 HEAVY DUTY, SINGLE POWER OPTION, CAPTAINS CHAIR, PATIENT WEIGHT CAPACITY 301 TO 450 POUNDS
K0839 POWER WHEELCHAIR, GROUP 2 VERY HEAVY DUTY, SINGLE POWER OPTION SLING/SOLID SEAT/BACK, PATIENT WEIGHT CAPACITY 451 TO 600 POUNDS
K0840 POWER WHEELCHAIR, GROUP 2 EXTRA HEAVY DUTY, SINGLE POWER OPTION, SLING/SOLID SEAT/BACK, PATIENT WEIGHT CAPACITY 601 POUNDS OR MORE
K0841 POWER WHEELCHAIR, GROUP 2 STANDARD, MULTIPLE POWER OPTION, SLING/SOLID SEAT/BACK, PATIENT WEIGHT CAPACITY UP TO AND INCLUDING 300 POUNDS
K0842 POWER WHEELCHAIR, GROUP 2 STANDARD, MULTIPLE POWER OPTION, CAPTAINS CHAIR, PATIENT WEIGHT CAPACITY UP TO AND INCLUDING 300 POUNDS
K0843 POWER WHEELCHAIR, GROUP 2 HEAVY DUTY, MULTIPLE POWER OPTION, SLING/SOLID SEAT/BACK, PATIENT WEIGHT CAPACITY 301 TO 450 POUNDS
K0848 POWER WHEELCHAIR, GROUP 3 STANDARD, SLING/SOLID SEAT/BACK, PATIENT WEIGHT CAPACITY UP TO AND INCLUDING 300 POUNDS
K0849 POWER WHEELCHAIR, GROUP 3 STANDARD, CAPTAINS CHAIR, PATIENT WEIGHT CAPACITY UP TO AND INCLUDING 300 POUNDS
K0850 POWER WHEELCHAIR, GROUP 3 HEAVY DUTY, SLING/SOLID SEAT/BACK, PATIENT WEIGHT CAPACITY 301 TO 450 POUNDS
K0851 POWER WHEELCHAIR, GROUP 3 HEAVY DUTY, CAPTAINS CHAIR, PATIENT WEIGHT CAPACITY 301 TO 450 POUNDS
K0852 POWER WHEELCHAIR, GROUP 3 VERY HEAVY DUTY, SLING/SOLID SEAT/BACK, PATIENT WEIGHT CAPACITY 451 TO 600 POUNDS
K0853 POWER WHEELCHAIR, GROUP 3 VERY HEAVY DUTY, CAPTAINS CHAIR, PATIENT WEIGHT CAPACITY 451 TO 600 POUNDS
K0854 POWER WHEELCHAIR, GROUP 3 EXTRA HEAVY DUTY, SLING/SOLID SEAT/BACK, PATIENT WEIGHT CAPACITY 601 POUNDS OR MORE
K0855 POWER WHEELCHAIR, GROUP 3 EXTRA HEAVY DUTY, CAPTAINS CHAIR, PATIENT WEIGHT CAPACITY 601 POUNDS OR MORE
K0856 POWER WHEELCHAIR, GROUP 3 STANDARD, SINGLE POWER OPTION, SLING/SOLID SEAT/BACK, PATIENT WEIGHT CAPACITY UP TO AND INCLUDING 300 POUNDS
K0857 POWER WHEELCHAIR, GROUP 3 STANDARD, SINGLE POWER OPTION, CAPTAINS CHAIR, PATIENT WEIGHT CAPACITY UP TO AND INCLUDING 300 POUNDS
K0858 POWER WHEELCHAIR, GROUP 3 HEAVY DUTY, SINGLE POWER OPTION, SLING/SOLID SEAT/BACK, PATIENT WEIGHT 301 TO 450 POUNDS
K0859 POWER WHEELCHAIR, GROUP 3 HEAVY DUTY, SINGLE POWER OPTION, CAPTAINS CHAIR, PATIENT WEIGHT CAPACITY 301 TO 450 POUNDS
K0860 POWER WHEELCHAIR, GROUP 3 VERY HEAVY DUTY, SINGLE POWER OPTION, SLING/SOLID SEAT/BACK, PATIENT WEIGHT CAPACITY 451 TO 600 POUNDS
K0861 POWER WHEELCHAIR, GROUP 3 STANDARD, MULTIPLE POWER OPTION, SLING/SOLID SEAT/BACK, PATIENT WEIGHT CAPACITY UP TO AND INCLUDING 300 POUNDS
K0862 POWER WHEELCHAIR, GROUP 3 HEAVY DUTY, MULTIPLE POWER OPTION, SLING/SOLID SEAT/BACK, PATIENT WEIGHT CAPACITY 301 TO 450 POUNDS
K0863 POWER WHEELCHAIR, GROUP 3 VERY HEAVY DUTY, MULTIPLE POWER OPTION, SLING/SOLID SEAT/BACK, PATIENT WEIGHT CAPACITY 451 TO 600 POUNDS
K0864 POWER WHEELCHAIR, GROUP 3 EXTRA HEAVY DUTY, MULTIPLE POWER OPTION, SLING/SOLID SEAT/BACK, PATIENT WEIGHT CAPACITY 601 POUNDS OR MORE
K0868 POWER WHEELCHAIR, GROUP 4 STANDARD, SLING/SOLID SEAT/BACK, PATIENT WEIGHT CAPACITY UP TO AND INCLUDING 300 POUNDS
K0869 POWER WHEELCHAIR, GROUP 4 STANDARD, CAPTAINS CHAIR, PATIENT WEIGHT CAPACITY UP TO AND INCLUDING 300 POUNDS
K0870 POWER WHEELCHAIR, GROUP 4 HEAVY DUTY, SLING/SOLID SEAT/BACK, PATIENT WEIGHT CAPACITY 301 TO 450 POUNDS
K0871 POWER WHEELCHAIR, GROUP 4 VERY HEAVY DUTY, SLING/SOLID SEAT/BACK, PATIENT WEIGHT CAPACITY 451 TO 600 POUNDS
K0877 POWER WHEELCHAIR, GROUP 4 STANDARD, SINGLE POWER OPTION, SLING/SOLID SEAT/BACK, PATIENT WEIGHT CAPACITY UP TO AND INCLUDING 300 POUNDS
K0878 POWER WHEELCHAIR, GROUP 4 STANDARD, SINGLE POWER OPTION, CAPTAINS CHAIR, PATIENT WEIGHT CAPACITY UP TO AND INCLUDING 300 POUNDS
K0879 POWER WHEELCHAIR, GROUP 4 HEAVY DUTY, SINGLE POWER OPTION, SLING/SOLID SEAT/BACK, PATIENT WEIGHT CAPACITY 301 TO 450 POUNDS
K0880 POWER WHEELCHAIR, GROUP 4 VERY HEAVY DUTY, SINGLE POWER OPTION, SLING/SOLID SEAT/BACK, PATIENT WEIGHT 451 TO 600 POUNDS
K0884 POWER WHEELCHAIR, GROUP 4 STANDARD, MULTIPLE POWER OPTION, SLING/SOLID SEAT/BACK, PATIENT WEIGHT CAPACITY UP TO AND INCLUDING 300 POUNDS
K0885 POWER WHEELCHAIR, GROUP 4 STANDARD, MULTIPLE POWER OPTION, CAPTAINS CHAIR, PATIENT WEIGHT CAPACITY UP TO AND INCLUDING 300 POUNDS
K0886 POWER WHEELCHAIR, GROUP 4 HEAVY DUTY, MULTIPLE POWER OPTION, SLING/SOLID SEAT/BACK, PATIENT WEIGHT CAPACITY 301 TO 450 POUNDS
K0890 POWER WHEELCHAIR, GROUP 5 PEDIATRIC, SINGLE POWER OPTION, SLING/SOLID SEAT/BACK, PATIENT WEIGHT CAPACITY UP TO AND INCLUDING 125 POUNDS
K0891 POWER WHEELCHAIR, GROUP 5 PEDIATRIC, MULTIPLE POWER OPTION, SLING/SOLID SEAT/BACK, PATIENT WEIGHT CAPACITY UP TO AND INCLUDING 125 POUNDS
K0898 POWER WHEELCHAIR, NOT OTHERWISE CLASSIFIED
K0899 POWER MOBILITY DEVICE, NOT CODED BY DME PDAC OR DOES NOT MEET CRITERIA

ICD-9 Codes that Support Medical Necessity back to top

Not specified.
XX000 Not Applicable
Diagnoses that Support Medical Necessity back to top

Not specified.

ICD-9 Codes that DO NOT Support Medical Necessity back to top

Not specified.
ICD-9 Codes that DO NOT Support Medical Necessity Asterisk Explanation back to top

Diagnoses that DO NOT Support Medical Necessity back to top

Not specified.

General Information
Documentation Requirements back to top

Section 1833(e) of the Social Security Act precludes payment to any provider of services unless "there has been furnished such information as may be necessary in order to determine the amounts due such provider". It is expected that the patient's medical records will reflect the need for the care provided. The patient's medical records include the physician's office records, hospital records, nursing home records, home health agency records, records from other healthcare professionals and test reports. This documentation must be available upon request.

ORDERS:

The order that the supplier must receive within 45 days after completion of the face-to-face examination (see Policy Article) must contain all of the following elements:
1. Beneficiary’s name
2. Description of the item that is ordered. This may be general – e.g., “power operated vehicle”, “power wheelchair”, or “power mobility device”– or may be more specific.
3. Date of the face-to-face examination
4. Pertinent diagnoses/conditions that relate to the need for the POV or power wheelchair
5. Length of need
6. Physician’s signature
7. Date of physician signature
A date stamp or equivalent must be used to document receipt date.

If a written order containing all of these required elements is not received by the supplier within 45 days after completion of the face-to-face examination an EY modifier must be added to the HCPCS codes for the power mobility device and all accessories. The order must be available on request.

Once the supplier has determined the specific power mobility device that is appropriate for the patient based on the physician's order, the supplier must prepare a written document (termed a detailed product description) that lists the wheelchair base and all options and accessories that will be separately billed. For the wheelchair base and each option/accessory, the supplier must enter all of the following:
• HCPCS code
• Narrative description of the HCPCS item
• Manufacturer name and model name/number
• Supplier’s charge
• Medicare fee schedule allowance
If there is no fee schedule allowance, the supplier must enter “not applicable”. The physician must sign and date this detailed product description and the supplier must receive it prior to delivery of the PWC or POV. A date stamp or equivalent must be used to document receipt date. The detailed product description must be available on request.

FACE-TO-FACE EXAMINATION:

The report of the face-to-face examination (see Policy Article) should provide information relating to the following questions.
For POVs and PWCs What is this patient’s mobility limitation and how does it interfere with the performance of activities of daily living?
For POVs and PWCs Why can’t a cane or walker meet this patient’s mobility needs in the home?
For POVs and PWCs Why can’t a manual wheelchair meet this patient’s mobility needs in the home?
For POVs Does this patient have the physical and mental abilities to transfer into a POV and to operate it safely in the home?
For PWCs Why can’t a POV (scooter) meet this patient’s mobility needs in the home?
For PWCs Does this patient have the physical and mental abilities to operate a power wheelchair safely in the home?

The report should provide pertinent information about the following elements, but may include other details. Each element would not have to be addressed in every evaluation.
• History of the present condition(s) and past medical history that is relevant to mobility needs
o Symptoms that limit ambulation
o Diagnoses that are responsible for these symptoms
o Medications or other treatment for these symptoms
o Progression of ambulation difficulty over time
o Other diagnoses that may relate to ambulatory problems
o How far the patient can walk without stopping
o Pace of ambulation
o What ambulatory assistance (cane, walker, wheelchair, caregiver) is currently used
o What has changed to now require use of a power mobility device
o Ability to stand up from a seated position without assistance
o Description of the home setting and the ability to perform activities of daily living in the home

• Physical examination that is relevant to mobility needs

o Weight and height
o Cardiopulmonary examination
o Musculoskeletal examination
 Arm and leg strength and range of motion

o Neurological examination
 Gait
 Balance and coordination
The evaluation should be tailored to the individual patient’s conditions. The history should paint a picture of the patient’s functional abilities and limitations on a typical day. It should contain as much objective data as possible. The physical examination should be focused on the body systems that are responsible for the patient’s ambulatory difficulty or impact on the patient’s ambulatory ability.

A date stamp or equivalent must be used to document the date that the supplier receives the report of the face-to-face examination The written report of this examination must be available upon request.

Physicians shall document the examination in a detailed narrative note in their charts in the format that they use for other entries. The note must clearly indicate that a major reason for the visit was a mobility examination.

Many suppliers have created forms which have not been approved by CMS which they send to physicians and ask them to complete. Even if the physician completes this type of form and puts it in his/her chart, this supplier-generated form is not a substitute for the comprehensive medical record as noted above. Suppliers are encouraged to help educate physicians on the type of information that is needed to document a patient’s mobility needs.

Physicians shall also provide reports of pertinent laboratory tests, x-rays, and/or other diagnostic tests (e.g., pulmonary function tests, cardiac stress test, electromyogram, etc.) performed in the course of management of the patient. Upon request, suppliers shall provide notes from prior visits to give a historical perspective of the progression of disease over time and to corroborate the information in the face-to-face examination.

If the report of a licensed/certified medical professional (LCMP) examination is to be considered as part of the face-to-face examination (see Policy Article), there must be a signed and dated attestation by the supplier or LCMP that the LCMP has no financial relationship with the supplier. (Note: Evaluations performed by an LCMP who has a financial relationship with the supplier may be submitted to provide additional clinical information, but will not be considered as part of the face-to-face examination by the physician.)

Although patients who qualify for coverage of a power mobility device may use that device outside the home, because Medicare’s coverage of a wheelchair or POV is determined solely by the patient’s mobility needs within the home, the examination must clearly distinguish the patient’s abilities and needs within the home from any additional needs for use outside the home.

SPECIALTY EVALUATION:

The specialty evaluation that is required for patients who receive a Group 2 Single Power Option or Multiple Power Options PWC, any Group 3 or Group 4 PWC, or a push-rim activated power assist device is in addition to the requirement for the face-to-face examination. The specialty evaluation provides detailed information explaining why each specific option or accessory – i.e., power seating system, alternate drive control interface, or push-rim activated power assist – is needed to address the patient’s mobility limitation. There must be a written report of this evaluation available on request.


HOME ASSESSMENT:

Prior to or at the time of delivery of a POV or PWC, the supplier or practitioner must perform an on-site evaluation of the patient’s home to verify that the patient can adequately maneuver the device that is provided considering physical layout, doorway width, doorway thresholds, and surfaces. There must be a written report of this evaluation available on request.

KX, GA, GY, AND GZ MODIFIERS:

If the requirements related to a face-to-face examination (see related Policy Article) have not been met, the GY modifier must be added to the codes for the power mobility device and all accessories.

If the power mobility device or push-rim activated power assist device that is provided is only needed for mobility outside the home, the GY modifier must be added to the codes for the item and all accessories.

A KX modifier may be added to the code for a power mobility device and all accessories only if one of the following conditions is met:
5. If all of the coverage criteria specified in this LCD have been met for the product that is provided; or
6. If there is an affirmative Advance Determination of Medicare Coverage (ADMC) for the product that is provided,: or
7. If a Group 4 PWC is provided and if all of the coverage criteria for a comparable Group 3 PWC have been met.
If the requirements for use of the KX modifier or GY modifier are not met, the GA or GZ modifier must be added to the code. When there is an expectation of a medical necessity denial, suppliers must enter GA on the claim line if they have obtained a properly executed Advance Beneficiary Notice (ABN) or GZ if they have not obtained a valid ABN.

Claim lines billed without a KX, GA, GY, or GZ modifier will be rejected as missing information.


MISCELLANEOUS:

The following power wheelchairs are eligible for Advance Determination of Medicare Coverage (ADMC):
8. A Group 2, 3, 4 or 5 Single Power Option or Multiple Power Options wheelchair (K0835-K0843, K0856-K0864, K0877-K0891) – whether or not a power seating system will be provided at the time of initial issue.
9. A Group 3 or 4 No Power Option wheelchair (K0848-K0855, K0868-K0871) that will be provided with an alternative drive control interface at the time of initial issue.
Refer to the ADMC section in the Supplier Manual for details concerning the ADMC process.

Refer to the Supplier Manual for more information on documentation requirements

Tuesday, April 27, 2010

The Enigma of Competitive Bidding

by Patrick Boardman


While I am a firm believer in free enterprise, competitive bidding simply isn’t competitive. If it were, there would not be a cap.

Think for a moment about one of your dearest family members. Imagine if you will that the were the unfortunately suddenly in grave need for a wheelchair. They would be unable to be independent without this equipment. Due to lack of sensation your loved one develops pressure ulcers where the bones in their tailbone break through the skin. They are in desperate need of a custom molded seating system and pressure mapping. (Lets keep in mind that pressure mapping is not reimbursable to a vendor. The cost for a system is $12,000).

You are concerned about the ability for a new wheelchair to fit into the various rooms of the house for baths etc.

Competitive bidding happens. You call your clinical facility. You live in Boston. A winning bidder in Seattle contracts another company an hour away in Methuen Ma. to come and do your wheelchair. The person that shows up tells you that you can only have a basic chair because the cost is prohibitive. No mold is done as it costs more to do the mold than the company is reimbursed. You have problems after the sale and are directed to call Seattle office. Seattle office tells you to call the Methuen office. You take a day off from work to wait for the technician to come repair your chair. They never show. Meanwhile your loved one is trapped in bed until the chair is fixed.

Now you could have called the company 10 miles away that has an excellent reputation in the industry. They have qualified, trained ATP’s on staff. They have always been an above board Medicare provider. But you cant call them for your new chair because they didn't bid low enough in a bidding process that attempts to drive reimbursements to a price that is lower than what the dealer pays for the equipment.

We all agree that Healthcare costs are outpacing our ability to contain them. DME and Rehab represents less than 1% of the total Healthcare pie, yet no other arena of the healthcare community has suffered such Draconian measures.

It is my strong belief that competitive bidding will have the following negative results:

1. Ethical Small businesses will be driven out of business.

2. Failure of such businesses will have an adverse impact on client choice and client care.

3. Inferior quality of care will result in higher costs for procedures such as myocutaneous skin graft surgeries, ER visits, and hospital and PCP visits. These unseen and increased expenses will far exceed the original savings sought.

As a member of the small business community my job, the life savings of the owners, and the jobs of my peers are at stake if Competitive Bidding is allowed to be employed. So for the safety, comfort, and care of our patients, please consider ending Competitive Bidding for good.

Saturday, April 24, 2010

North Texas legislators seek tougher action against health care contractor Evercare

10:41 PM CST on Wednesday, February 11, 2009


By ROBERT T. GARRETT / The Dallas Morning News

rtgarrett@dallasnews.com

AUSTIN – North Texas lawmakers have urged the state to crack down on a health insurer that manages care of the area's 78,000 elderly and disabled Medicaid patients.
Republican Sens. Jane Nelson of Flower Mound and Chris Harris of Arlington said Wednesday that fines against Evercare of Texas haven't worked.

At a Senate Finance Committee hearing, both senators said that they still field many complaints from Evercare plan members who can't find doctors willing to see them.

"Citizens are finding it extremely difficult to find a provider," Nelson said.

Nelson, the Senate's chief health policy writer, recounted taking a call from a woman with a uterine tumor. The woman couldn't obtain treatment because no local gynecologist would sign a contract with Evercare, a unit of the giant UnitedHealth Group, Nelson said.

"We just don't seem to be getting anywhere," Nelson told Albert Hawkins, who runs Medicaid in Texas as head of the Health and Human Services Commission. "We've got to do something to fix it."

The problems that Texans have had with Evercare were the focus of a Dallas Morning News investigation last month.

Hawkins said he shares lawmakers' frustrations, though he stopped short of threatening to revoke the UnitedHealth subsidiary's $1.8 million-per-month contract.

An Evercare spokeswoman said the company has made "significant progress" lately.

"There were challenges taking over this program from the state, but we continue to work aggressively to address each member's concern," said Beth Mandell, the company's regional executive director.

Sunday, January 11, 2009

New KE Modifier for Complex Rehab

By Patrick Boardman
J and R Medical Houston Texas


Effective January 1st, 2009 the new KE modifier was put into place by CMS. The purpose of the modifier is to differentiate between items that were under competitive bidding and subject to the 9.5% reduction, and items that weren't. Here is the CMS definition:

"The KE modifier is used to identify an accessory code that can be dually billed with either a competitive or non-competitive bid base item, the KE modifier must be appended to the accessory code if it is billed with a non-competitively bid base item."

An example of the proper use of the KE modifier would be as follows:

K0040 Angle Adjustable Footplates

Scenario 1: Used with a HCPC code of K0004 Manual Wheelchair. Since the manual chair was not part of competitive bidding, the KE modifier would be used to ensure the 9.5% reduction is NOT applied.

Scenario 2: Used with a HCPC code K0856 Power Wheelchair. Since power chairs were under competitive bidding, a KE modifier cannot be used and you will see a 9.5% reduction in the K0040 allowable.


It is important to note that claims should not be filed using the KE modifier for any item that was under Round 1 of competitive bidding.

If anyone has any questions, feel free to contact me. We encourage networking with our peers.


Patrick Boardman
J and R Medical, Houston, Texas
aamobility.com


Free Web Counter

Free Counter